Marvel Future Fight Dispatch Mission 4 5, German Candy Not Available In Us, Microsoft Bluetooth Tastatur Verbindet Nicht, Schnitzmühle Happy Weekend, Articles H

This appeal concerns the meaning of that provision and its application to the facts of this case. The case concerned individual decisions in a fact specific case, and not policies of general application introduced by public officials. The act of selling the ticket to someone who was actually under 16 was enough to make the defendants guilty, even though they had done their best to prevent this happening in their shop.The Divisional Court justified this by stating that the legislation dealt with an issue of social concern. Regina v Barnet London Borough Council, Ex parte Shah: HL ... - swarb.co.uk (PDF) Criminal Law Notes and Cases.pdf - Academia.edu Justification for Strict Liability Flashcards by USER 1 - Brainscape Harrow London Borough Council v. Shah (1999) 2 Cr App Rep 457 (CD) 320 although this area is very haphazard as in the case of Harrow LBC v Shah (1999) where there was a section in the statute to allow a due diligence defence for promoters of the lottery but not for those managing businesses where the lottery is sold. A short summary of this paper. Strict liability crimes are very common. Cornerstone Barristers | Michael Paget In . Harrow LBC v Shah & Shah: A newsagent was convicted for selling a lottery ticket to a person under 16 even though it had told its staff to ask for proof of age if there was any doubt, and the member of staff who actually sold the ticket believed the . Welcome to Waltham Forest. 5.1 Principal offenders. A shop keeper was held liable even though it . .". The defendant appealed their conviction. This is, I have no doubt, a significant feature of the words' ordinary meaning for it is an important factor distinguishing ordinary residence from domicile. There have also been a number of other cases which involved a regulatory offence being interpreted as an offence of strict liability, Cundy v Le Cocq (1884), Gammon (1984), Harrow LBC v Shah